Friday, January 27, 2012

Site Search

Archive for May, 2010

BellBrook Labs Launches a New Transcreener HTS Enzyme Assay

Madison, Wis. (PRWEB) January 11, 2010 — BellBrook Labs today announced that it has launched a new product in their proprietary Transcreener HTS Assay platform. The Transcreener GDP FI Assay was developed for detection of GTPases, a large family of enzymes that play diverse roles in normal and disease-related cell processes. The new assay overcomes a longstanding problem in GTPase detection in that it relies on direct detection of GDP rather than phosphate. Phosphate is a component of many biomolecules and commonly used reagents, and its ubiquitous presence in biological samples causes high background and false positives in the current GTPase enzyme assays. BellBrook’s new assay detects GDP – a much more specific product of GTPase enzymes – eliminating the background problems associated with phosphate detection.

Transcreener is a universal, high throughput biochemical assay platform based on detection of nucleotides, which are formed by thousands of cellular enzymes, many of which catalyze the covalent regulatory reactions that are central to cell signaling and represent new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. It relies on highly specific antibodies that detect nucleotides coupled with homogenous fluorescent detection formats suitable for automated HTS applications. A single Transcreener assay can be used with any enzyme that produces a given nucleotide, allowing detection of hundreds of different drug targets. It is the only enzyme assay method that allows direct detection of nucleotide enzyme products without the use of additional coupling or reporter enzymes, which are a common source of interference by chemical library compounds. BellBrook currently holds three patents on the Transcreener technology and the company is pursuing additional patent applications. In addition to BellBrook’s own Transcreener line, a number of other companies in the Life Science sector including Invitrogen, CisBio and Evotec have licensed the Transcreener technology for their own HTS assay products and/or screening services.

The new GDP assay is similar to BellBrook’s flagship product, the Transcreener ADP Assay, which was introduced in 2006, and has since been validated by pharmaceutical companies worldwide in tens of millions of HTS assays. The company launched a fluorescence polarization GDP assay in 2009, and developed the new fluorescence intensity assay to target academic laboratories that may not have access to an expensive multimode plate reader. The assay incorporates a novel non-fluorescent quencher licensed from Li-Cor Biosciences in addition to BellBrook’s antibody technology. Binding of GDP to the antibody displaces a red tracer, which relieves quenching and results in a fluorescence increase. The positive fluorescent signal is another unique feature of the assay and makes it attractive to new users who are not familiar with competitive immunoassay formats such as TR-FRET and FP.

About BellBrook Labs. BellBrook Labs, LLC was founded in 2002 and currently employs 21 people. The company develops detection reagents and microfluidic devices that accelerate the discovery of more effective therapies for cancer and other debilitating diseases. Transcreener® is a patented high throughput screening assay platform that was introduced in 2005 and is used to identify inhibitors for kinases and other types of protein drug targets. The iuvo™ Microconduit Array technology is a line of unique microscale devices for miniaturization and automation of advanced cell models that are more representative of human physiology. Visit BellBrook’s website for more information: www.bellbrooklabs.com.

source: prweb.com

Genedata at HCA Announces Banner Year for Genedata Screener at Leading Pharmaceutical Companies

7 out of the 25 top pharmas now use Genedata Screener for High Content Screening analysis.

San Francisco, CA (PRWEB) January 11, 2010 — Genedata, a leading provider of advanced software solutions for drug discovery and life science research, today announced that over the past 12 months Genedata Screener has experienced unprecedented industry adoption with 7 out of the 25 leading pharmaceutical companies using Screener for High Content Screening (HCS) analysis. Screener’s HCS capabilities support complex multiplexed assay formats, enable comparative visualization of HCS images and help standardize processes from a centrally managed platform. The announcement was made at the 7th Annual High Content Analysis Conference where Genedata is presenting and exhibiting (January 11 – 15; Fairmont Hotel – Booth # 27).

HCS analysis within a high throughput screening infrastructure is evolving and 2009 proved to be the year in which we saw leading pharmaceutical companies understand how they can use Screener’s HCS capabilities in conjunction with their high throughput screening workflows,” said Dr. Othmar Pfannes, CEO of Genedata. “These companies have quickly transitioned from the learning – enlightenment phase to actual production in which data analysis is no longer a bottleneck in high content screening.”

leading pharmaceutical companies understand how they can use Screener’s HCS capabilities in conjunction with their high throughput screening workflows

Genedata customers, who rely on Screener for high content confirmation and secondary screens, are beginning to use Screener for HCS at high throughputs. Several customers report that Screener HCS enables them to easily process 1,000,000 compounds or more per screen. This is a result of Screener’s ability to leverage this information within a scalable framework, which features automated data processing and intelligent management functions – all of which can be reviewed by scientists at any stage in the process. “2009 was a banner year for HCS adoption,” continued Pfannes, “and I project that 2010 will be the year in which we see HCS in far more rigorous production settings as well as continued adoption by customers looking for a scalable HCS technology.”Screener standardizes and automates in-depth analysis of high content screens passing from single-cell data to hit selection in a highly efficient workflow. The increased throughput of Screener HCS and user-friendly interface for visualization, management, and review allows researchers and scientists to review more cellular images in less time and quickly identify subtle variances. While Screener is fully compatible with the Thermo Scientific Cellomics Store image management system, it has also been integrated with other in-house and commercial HCS image storage solutions.

Note to Editors: Genedata will deliver a presentation on how to establish a routine application of HCS in high throughput screening at HCA on January 13th at 1:00 p.m. To schedule an editorial briefing, email Jackie.Thrasivoulos@genedata.com.

About Genedata
Genedata transforms data into intelligence with a portfolio of advanced software solutions for drug discovery and life science research, which spans target, lead and biomarker discovery. Used by a majority of the world’s top 50 pharmaceutical companies and leading research organizations, Genedata Phylosopher®, Genedata Screener®, and Genedata Expressionist® make research data accessible and understandable, enabling scientific discovery that fights disease and improves health worldwide. Founded in 1997, Genedata is privately held, with headquarters in Basel, Switzerland, and offices in Japan, Germany and the US. www.genedata.com

Disclaimer
The statements in this press release that relate to future plans, events or performance are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including risks associated with uncertainties related to contract cancellations, developing risks, competitive factors, uncertainties pertaining to customer orders, demand for products and services, development of markets for the Company’s products and services. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to release publicly the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

All product and service names mentioned are the trademarks of their respective companies.

Scientist developing new way to diagnose, treat cancer Read more: Scientist developing new way to diagnose, treat cancer – Philadelphia Business Journal:

Ira S. Ayene is working on a new way to fight cancer.

His strategy involves targeting tumor cells under metabolic stress caused by lower than normal concentrations of glucose in their environment. Glucose, a sugar, is the body’s primary source of energy.

Ayene has developed a compound that would be toxic for cells in low glucose environments, but would not damage tissue with normal levels of glucose.

Under these metabolic conditions, the compound attacks proteins required for normal cell function, but the compound is deactivated under normal glucose conditions found everywhere in the body other than tumor cells.

To advance his research, and possibly create a company to commercialize his discovery, Ayene left the University of Pennsylvania in 2006 to become an associate professor at the Lankenau Institute for Medical Research (LIMR) in Wynnewood.

J. Todd Abrams, director of philanthropy and business development at LIMR, said the first-of-its kind therapeutic should be effective against almost any solid tumor.

The discovery also paved the way for the development of an assay (a procedure in molecular biology for screening drugs) that measures the status of metabolic pathways in both individual and cell cultures. Potential applications of Ayene’s assay include predicting the effectiveness of a treatment, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy, in a patient with cancer and evaluating potential new treatments for cancer and other diseases.

Abrams turned to BioStrategy Partners, a virtual incubator organization for the life sciences industry, for help in determining how best to commercialize Ayene’s discoveries.

“We provide the scientific support,” he said. “BioStrategy Partners provides the business support.”

LIMR expanded its role to include serving as an incubator for early-stage life sciences companies under the direction of George C. Prendergast, the institute’s president and CEO who joined in 2004.

Prendergast has focused LIMR research on disease modifiers and immune system regulators.

Abrams, who handles technology transfer issues for the institute, said Prendergast wants LIMR to be a place not only for scientific discoveries but also a place where those discoveries are advanced to have a direct impact on patient health.

“The idea was to put the ‘D’ into R&D,” Abrams said. “Academic research tends to move along at its own pace. The idea behind having an incubator was to help further develop those discoveries. We only invite companies that have a connection with the research being done at LIMR. They need to benefit from being here, and we need to benefit from having them here.”

For Ayene, the questions were: Did his inventions provide the framework for a company? And should those inventions be bundled together or separated?

The questions made Ayene a suitable candidate for BioStrategy Partners’ germinator program.

He initially spent two hours in his lab discussing his inventions and potential applications with Maureen O’Leary, program director at BioStrategy Partners. Born in a small town called Pondicherry in India, Ayene credits O’Leary with expanding his mindset beyond that of typical researchers from India who have historically only thought about science.

“She taught me being an entrepreneur is not a bad thing,” he joked.

BioStrategy Partners then put together a panel of experts to analyze Ayene’s research and development and create a plan for how best to advance his discoveries. That panel included O’Leary, Lorraine Keller, executive vice president at MBF Therapeutics; MBF’s CEO Tom Tillet, a former executive with Keller at Rohm and Haas, and the former CEO and co-founder with Keller of RheoGene; Bill Moore, vice president of Strategic Consulting Services and a former executive at Locus Pharmaceutics; and Johanna Allston, chief commercial officer of Procognia Ltd. in Exton and a former ViroPharma executive and co-founder.

After a series of meetings, they put together a report that suggested seeking partners interested in licensing the assay, which would help fund further development of his compound.

“The idea is to de-risk the technology so we can better attract investors,” Abrams said

The panel also suggested pursuing federal grants and QED proof-of-concept funding from the Science Center in Philadelphia as a way to finance the compound’s development.

Abrams said he is in talks with one biotech company interested in Ayene’s assay technology. He said forming a company to commercialize the anti-cancer compound is under consideration, but a faster way may be to license the compound to a drug company. “Our goal is to help patients,” he said. “The issue is drug companies today aren’t licensing compounds until they get into the clinic [for testing in humans].”

While working with BioStrategy Partners, LIMR also brought in an outside consulting group to study Ayene’s work. “They reached basically the same conclusions,” Abrams said.

Product Focus: Automated Liquid Handling

Automated liquid handlers encompass a range of instruments and systems whose function is to dispense liquids rapidly, usually in very small quantities, at user-specified volumes, and with great accuracy, precision, and reproducibility.

Liquid handlers are sold in a variety of fluid-dispensing configurations, from single-channel through eight (one row of a 96-well microtiter plate), 96, and 384 channels. As the successors to manual pipettes, automated liquid handlers are the principal enablers of rapid experiments and assays conducted in tubes, vials, or microtiter plates. Liquid handlers are often just one component of systems consisting of microplate handlers, washers, readers, stackers, shakers, and incubators. Automation became necessary as assays were miniaturized from vials to tubes, and finally to microplates, and as researchers switched from radionuclide-based assays to tests that used non-radioactive detection.

Biology, medical testing, and screening of development-stage drugs are the primary markets for automated liquid handling. The energy, environmental, and heavy industries also use liquid handlers when accuracy and reproducibility, but not necessarily high throughput, are desired. “Any time you work with many samples and small quantities of fluids, automating liquid handling with a workstation will provide good return on investment,” says Scott Eaton, director of robotics marketing at Hamilton (Reno, NV).

Assessing workflow requirements is essential when selecting an automation system. Liquid transfers take time, which adds up rapidly as dispensing and other operations increase. Users who work with labile or highly toxic samples or reagents may prefer to process a smaller number of plates per run in order to move them rapidly through the protocol.

Another factor to consider, Eaton says, is the effect of physical forces on very small liquid-dispensing volumes used in higherdensity plates. “While 96-well plates remain the most common, 384- and even 1,586- well systems that employ sub-microliter volumes are gaining in popularity. At these volumes, evaporation and absorption onto the plastic plate surface become issues.”

Automated liquid handlers have evolved from automated pipetting systems to workstations that employ liquid handling as one component, according to Nance Hall, vice president for automation and detection systems at PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA). Today’s systems perform washing, incubation, and plate manipulation in addition to dispensing. “In the past, liquid handlers performed just one function; today, they are ‘application solutions’ in which liquid handling is part of a larger picture,” Hall says.

Differentiators

Eaton believes a combination of ease-ofuse and flexibility in software is an important differentiator when selecting an automated liquid handler. “Some software is very easy to use, but it’s locked into specific applications.” The best of both worlds, he says, is a software package that presents operations graphically, provides “wizards” or templates for routine tasks, and that adapts to different assays.

Hall suggests that potential buyers analyze their liquid-handling needs the way a cook examines a recipe. “What are the ‘ingredients’? What labware are we dispensing from and into? What do I expect from the automation component? What volumes are involved, and what sample-tip options are available?” Hall says. “Users who fail to optimize the liquid handler’s fluidics design to desired volumes will be forced to compromise either on performance or throughput.”

Users should weigh throughput considerations when considering a liquid-handler purchase, says Jason Greene, liquid-handling product manager at BioTek (Winooski, VT). “The cutoff point for automation versus a multi-channel handheld pipette is several strips [rows or columns on a microplate] per day,” Greene says.

This seems like a small number of assays to justify the investment in automation, but as Greene notes, liquid handling is just one component of what may be a complex workflow. “Operating manually, users must work through the various reagent additions, incubations, washing, and reading steps,” he says. “Nobody likes to wash microplates. It’s pretty easy to get users to buy into the idea of automation on that function alone.” Moreover, he says, even low-throughput labs come to value the reproducibility of automated systems.

For Nadine Gassner, associate director of the Chemical Screening Center at the University of California-Santa Cruz, experience with a particular vendor is a major factor in selecting a liquid-handling system. The center, which performs highthroughput screening on natural-product and newly synthesized drug candidates, has the capability of testing hundreds of thousands of compounds in one experiment using 96- and 384-well plates.

Gassner had already been using a PerkinElmer plate reader. During the startup phase of the screening center, she visited the company and was impressed with the ability of its liquid handlers to service a variety of assays. “We were also looking for a strong industry track record and considered our experiences with PerkinElmer’s excellent service.”

Angelo DePalma holds a Ph.D. in organic chemistry and has worked in the pharmaceutical industry. You can reach him at angelo@adepalma.com.

C. elegans Assisted Screening of New Drugs


Caenorhabditis elegans, a nematode

Researchers at McMaster University have developed a way to propel and direct microscopic-sized worms (C. elegans nematodes) along a narrow channel using a mild electric field. The discovery opens up significant possibilities for developing high-throughput micro-screening devices for drug discovery and other applications.

The research is described in the January 21, 2010 issue of Lab on a Chip, a leading international journal in the field of nanotechnology and bioengineering. The researchers demonstrate movement of the worms forward and in reverse inside a microchannel, guided by the direction of the electric field (electrotaxis).

“This is the first time that worms have been stimulated to move in a micro-channel device in a very precise and directed way,” said Bhagwati Gupta, assistant professor of biology. “It will allow researchers to study in real time how a proposed drug affects neurons and muscles that control motion of a live specimen.”

“The electrotaxis of the worms has the potential to automate what is currently a slow, manual process for drug screening on worms,” said Ravi Selvaganapathy, assistant professor of mechanical engineering. “The system is fairly easy and inexpensive to scale up to conduct rapid screening of tens of thousands of chemicals in worms to identify drug candidates in a cost-effective manner. Such discovery could accelerate clinical trials in people by allowing scientists to focus only on relevant drugs and would use limited resources more efficiently.”

C. elegans is a proven animal model for the study of human diseases because it utilizes many of the same proteins and molecules as humans. It also has a generation time of approximately only four days and a lifespan of about two to three weeks. This accelerates the understanding of the function of disease-related proteins.  The use of C. elegans as a genetic model organism was first undertaken by Sydney Brenner in 1974. He was presented with the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2002 for his work in this area. Researchers working with C. elegans were also awarded Nobel prizes in 2006 and 2008.

Currently, researchers observe worms individually under a microscope as they move in a random manner or in a direction forced by pressure. The new development retains a worm’s natural motion and causes no harm to the worm.  Researchers also found that the response of the worms was dependent on its age and neuronal development. This allows for large numbers of worms to be sorted and handled in an automated manner. This discovery allow the researchers to study how neurons respond to electricity. It can also be used to fabricate new kinds of devices to handle and manipulate large numbers of worms.

Source: biomedme.com

Sanofi-aventis’ purchase aligned with technology ‘coming of age’

Sanofi-aventis’ acquisition of the pharmaceutical development company that began as Selectide is “coincident with the technology, essentially, coming of age,” according to Tucson Research Center scientific director Ken Wertman.

“It is inextricably tied to this sense we have reached the objective;” namely, to use technology to effectively develop and analyze compounds for further investigation as potential pharmaceuticals.

While previous ownership had “a lot of confidence,” particularly in their ability to “predict outcomes” through scientific research, the discovery organization within Sanofi-aventis “was more modest in its self-assessment,” Wertman said.

Sanofi-aventis emphasizes calculation and engineering, and requires “an exploratory mindset and an open-mindedness. This technology fit beautifully with that outlook.

“It’s going there to see what happens,” Wertman said. “This technology is a chemical space exploration vehicle, that’s the most succinct way to describe what we do.” It’s about “going in the unknown.”

“The mantra now is to be humble, and do good science,” Wertman said. “If something useful comes out of it, you’re good. It’s a question of what direction you go exploring.”

Wertman likes to call his colleagues “venture chemists.”

“This is a group of entrepreneurs,” said Wertman. “There are a lot of bright scientists.”

His job “is about helping scientists align technology for greatest impact within the company,” Wertman said. And, from the therapeutic side of Sanofi-aventis pharmaceutical research, Wertman helps identify “which projects Tucson could have the greatest impact upon.”

Eight years ago, Tucson took on Sanofi-aventis projects “essentially stalled within the company, things important to the therapeutic departments” that were not moving ahead through the classic approach of screening the historical legacy of compounds, “and had not found a good starting point for optimization,” Wertman said.

Scientists in Tucson thought there was “no better way to show new kinds of compounds were important.

“We made the argument that ‘we don’t have all the fundamental molecules we need,’” Wertman said. It was “audacious,” he suggests, to “take the problem projects, and see if we could succeed. It took a lot of grit and determination. There is a lot of sense of ownership around the things we work on. We wanted to show the importance of the technology, that it can deliver, and that what it can deliver can be part of a successful next decade in pharmaceutical discovery.

“Now, somehow, we’ve achieved that core mission.”

Scientists in Tucson are making “new kinds of molecules,” the likes of which may never have been made before.” They “choose the molecules we make for very good reasons,” Wertman said, but they are explored objectively to “discover things you could not predict.”

“We’re trying to use the technology to push compounds further and further toward that candidate status,” Wertman said. “The mission, fundamentally, hasn’t changed. That’s one of the interesting things about the Tucson story.”

source: explorernews.com

Product Focus: Ultra-High-Throughput Screening

Ultra-high-throughput screening (uHTS) is an automation-based methodology for conducting hundreds of thousands of biological or chemical screening tests per day. The cutoff between high-throughput screening (HTS) and ultra-high-throughput is somewhat arbitrary. “There is no fixed boundary,” says Simon Sheard, Ph.D., business development manager at RTS Life Science (Manchester, UK), which supplies automated sample management equipment used in uHTS. The generally accepted crossover point today is 100,000 tests per day.uHTS is conducted in microtiter plates. To provide numerical perspective, 100,000 tests per day require 1,450 96-well plates (by far the most commonly used type), 261 384-well plates, or 65 1536-well plates. uHTS programs that exceed 1 million screens per day use ten times as many plates.

Equipment for conducting uHTS is indistinguishable from a standard microplate handling system, consisting of a robotic microplate handler, a liquid dispenser, and a plate reader. Additional components for washing, agitation, bar code reading and incubation are also possible.

uHTS achieves its speed through a combination of higher-density microtiter plates and multichannel (384 and higher) liquid dispensing. Equally important in achieving high throughput, however, is assay simplicity. Most ultrafast screens involve simple binding and rapid reading of results. For this reason, uHTS lends itself most readily to drug screening where, classically, tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of wells are plated with entries from a large compound library, and the assay reagents (protein, enzyme, cell, or receptor, plus reporting reagent) remain constant in every well. Depending on the nature of the detection event, the interaction between compound and target is read as fluorescence or luminescence.

It is possible to “cheat” in HTS/uHTS by utilizing unpurified compounds, mixtures of compounds, or even multiple targets, a technique known as high-content screening because a multiple of the information normally available is collected. Wells that “light up” are examined more closely, for example by purifying mixtures or plating components individually.

The pharmaceutical connection

Parallel screening methods have been used for decades in the pharmaceutical industry. The advent of automated plate-handling and reading instrumentation, and the replacement of radiolabeling assays with luminescence- and fluorescence-based screens, created the opportunity for the several-hundredfold improvement in throughput represented by uHTS. Original equipment was expensive, but over the past decade instrumentation prices have fallen in terms of cost per assay per day, to the point where uHTS is now accessible to small drug discovery firms and academic groups. Numerous service providers also conduct uHTS services for organizations that lack this capability or whose own systems are overcommitted.

Wei Zheng, Ph.D., a group leader at the NIH Chemical Genomics Center (Rockville, Md.) learned the HTS and uHTS trades while screening drug candidates at Merck and Amgen. One of the instruments in use at the NIH Center is a plate-handling robotic system, codeveloped by Zheng at Merck, that processes hundreds of thousands of wells per day and has 1,536-well capability. “It runs between half a million and a million screens per day, depending on the assay,” Zheng told Lab Manager Magazine. The system uses plate readers from PerkinElmer and GE, and core robotics from Kalypsys Systems.

Zheng’s group uses 1,536-well plates almost exclusively, as do most pharmaceutical labs. “Miniaturization saves time and enables higher throughput at reduced cost,” he notes. However, minuscule assay volumes sometimes create difficulties for cell-based assays. “It’s often difficult to deliver the number of cells you need for an assay at such low volumes. In these circumstances the screens cannot be run at 1,536-well density.”

Recently, researchers from the Chemical Genomics Center, in collaboration with scientists at Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland) reported on a screen of 17,143 FDA-approved and experimental drugs. The biological target in this case was a panel of human liver enzymes that metabolize drugs, and hence are critical to a medicine’s effectiveness.

uHTS received a bad reputation around the beginning of the decade, based on a perceived low success rate in identifying new drugs. The fault, says Zheng, was not with uHTS methods but with the drug companies’ choice of screening targets.

Simon Sheard agrees. “We hear comments about the failure of the ‘law of big numbers’ regularly. That’s a generalization, and the approach of cranking the handle faster has not completely fallen out of use. Nevertheless, what we have seen during the last few years is a shift away from uHTS to automated screening of smaller compound sets through assays that provide more information per well, or higher-quality data.”

HTS and uHTS systems don’t differ much in terms of instrumentation. What changes is the trend towards modularity. “Both systems employ a collection of instruments linked by software and robotics,” Sheard observes. As assay strategies become more sophisticated and screens more numerous, the number of components increases. uHTS is greatly facilitated, for example, by dedicated compound management systems that store compounds directly in readyto- test plates. At some point, Sheard notes, “It may not be sensible to have a single robot feeding plates to numerous instruments.” And all this added functionality necessitates software products that tie everything together seamlessly.

Forget to take your Ginkgo biloba? Turns out, it doesn’t matter

Among the natural products on pharmacy shelves, I was rooting for Ginkgo biloba for the prevention of dementia. For one, dementia is a horrible illness. Secondly, currently available drugs for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have little meaningful effect. Thirdly, preliminary data with ginkgo for AD looked encouraging. I recall reading this systematic review back in 2000. One sentence jumped out at me (the bolding is mine):

We conclude that for selegiline, vitamin E, lecithin, linopirdine, and propentofylline the published data do not provide support for efficacy. Based on the evidence we reviewed, it is our conclusion that donepezil, metrifonate and rivastigmine, however, all provide statistically significant modest benefit on cognitive performance and global functioning to the elderly with probable AD who are eligible for inclusion in clinical trials. The magnitude of the effect is similar for all of the medications. The results from the trials of ginkgo biloba are promising but the effects are smaller than those from the above mentioned therapies.

So the effect, while weak, was just about as bad as the prescription alternatives. For a “natural” remedy, that’s pretty good. But as with most small clinical trials, what appears to be clinically and statistically significant usually disappears when larger, more rigorous trials are conducted. And that seems to be the case now, with a publication in the December 23, 2009 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. But before we dive into the trial, let’s look at why ginkgo is even being studied at all.

The Background

Received June 22, 2009; accepted October 15, 2009

Source: oxfordjournals.org

James Thomson’s Cellular Dynamics Launches iCell Cardiomyocytes Commercially for Drug Candidate Toxicity Screening

The University of Wisconsin’s James Thomson, whose vision was behind the founding of Cellular Dynamics, has from the initial creation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells felt that their use in the testing of new drugs would mark their greatest contribution, at least initially.Thursday the company announced the commercial launch of iCell Cardiomyocytes for use in testing of new drug candidates by the pharmaceutical industry. These human heart cells are designed to aid drug discovery and improve the predictability of drug compound efficacy and toxicity screens, weeding out ineffective and potentially toxic compounds early in the pharmaceutical pipeline process before significant time and resources have been invested.

iCell Cardiomyocytes are the first product developed by anyone from iPS cells and were discovered by CDI senior research fellow Junying Yu, Ph.D., then a postdoctoral research associate in the University of Wisconsin-Madison laboratory of James Thomson.  Yu’s discovery followed a similar and almost simultaneous discovery by Shinya Yamanaka at Kyoto University.

Derived from induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, iCell Cardiomyocytes spontaneously beat in vitro and exhibit the electrophysiological and biochemical properties of normal human heart cells. Thus, both logically and according to Cellular Dynamics, iCell Cardiomyocytes provide significant advances over non-human cell models, which may exhibit a different response than human tissue. The same advantage is suggested to hold over tumor-derived cell models, which are genetically different than normal cells; and cadaveric cells, which exhibit batch-to-batch variability, de-differentiate under in vitro conditions, and exhibit non-cardiomyocyte behavior.

iCell Cardiomyocytes are produced in-house by Cellular Dynamics from a master cell bank of iPS cells expanded from a single clonal population reprogrammed from fully mature human cells using Dr. Thomson’s patented technology. Cellular Dynamics has reportedly developed a proprietary process to industrialize iCell Cardiomyocytes production so that the cardiomyocytes are manufactured at the high quantity, quality and purity required by pharmaceutical companies. The company has successfully engaged in pre-launch validation testing with several pharmaceutical customers.

James Thomson, chief scientific officer, had the following to say about the iCell launch: “Rapid application of stem cell technology has been a goal both of my laboratory at the University of Wisconsin and Cellular Dynamics. Utilizing human iPS cells for new drug toxicity testing should improve the drug discovery process in a timeframe that has an effect on human healthcare now, not 10 years from now. Ultimately applications of stem cell technology in drug discovery will provide great utility and enable movement toward a long-term goal of cellular-based therapeutics and personalized medicine.”

Adapted from the Cellular Dynamics announcement.

Source: stemcelldigest.net