Friday, September 03, 2010

Site Search

Archive for the ‘FDA News’ Category

US launches new regulatory science programm

Two major US government agencies have partnered to create a new regulatory science programme to ensure better integration between cutting edge science and regulatory processes in assessing new medical products or compounds flowing from biomedical research.

Announced on 24 February, the effort is a joint venture of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who will create a joint ‘Leadership Council’ to spearhead the collaborative work. The new body will be charged with ensuring that regulatory considerations form an ‘integral component of biomedical research planning’, and that ‘the latest science is integrated into the regulatory review process’, according to the two agencies.

Under the new endeavour, the NIH and FDA are also making a total of $6.75 million (£4.45 million) available over three years for work that can yield new methods, models or technologies that will provide better approaches to evaluating safety and efficacy in medical product development. The lion’s share of the money – $6 million – will come from the NIH.

‘Scientific advances will reduce the need for large animal studies to predict how humans will respond to chemical exposure,’ FDA spokesperson Karen Riley tells Chemistry World. ‘Some assessments will be able to be done using cell culture or genomic microarrays, which might be done more quickly and at lower cost.’

Among a range of activities, the agencies want to support work involving the implementation of assessment tools for emerging fields like nanomedicine and RNA interference therapy, and also support the development of novel manufacturing technologies to enhance product safety.

Weak and under-developed’ 

‘We have allowed the arm of regulatory science to become weak and under-developed,’ FDA commissioner, Margaret Hamburg, said during a 24 February briefing. If this ‘imbalance’ persists, she cautioned, the full potential of the biomedical research revolution will not be realised.

The American Chemistry Council (ACC) – an industry trade association for US chemical companies – supports harnessing new advanced molecular screening methods, but warns that many are premature.

‘Although these methodologies hold great promise, many aren’t yet ready for regulatory use,’ Rick Becker, an ACC senior toxicologist, tells Chemistry World.

Becker says additional research is needed to ‘develop confidence’ in these molecular screening techniques. ‘At some point, we believe data can be used to augment existing regulatory science and perhaps in the future replace existing animal testing in product safety assessment,’ he states.

Slow procedure

Slow procedure

It takes 15 years on average for a drug discovery to make it to a patient’s medicine cabinet. Throughout the process, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires drug companies to submit applications to proceed to the next step.

1 Drug discovery and preclinical research (three to six years) – Researchers search for candidate drugs by screening chemical compounds that contain thousands or millions of potential medicines. They test the candidates against the disease target.

Once a compound has shown some activity against the drug target, it undergoes extensive testing in the lab – both in test tubes and animals. Years of preclinical testing must establish that the candidate medicine is likely to be safe and effective in humans before clinical testing can begin.

2 Clinical trials (six to seven years) – When a company is ready to begin clinical trials, it submits an Investigational New Drug Application to the FDA showing the data it has gathered in preclinical tests, as well as a clinical studies plan or protocol. Testing occurs in three phases:

Phase 1 – A small group of healthy people is tested to see how the chemical compound affects the body.

Phase 2 – The drug is tested in patients who have the disease in question.

Phase 3 – The drug is tested in hundreds or thousands of patients to find any rare or adverse side effects.

3 FDA review and manufacturing (two years) – Upon successful completion of clinical trials, the company submits a New Drug Application to the FDA.

Teams of engineers, biologists, chemists and physicists work to develop ways to produce the medicine on a large scale.

SOURCE: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America

Source: Dallasnews.com

PharmaGap Reports That GAP-107B8 Showed Strong and Consistent Anti-Cancer Activity in a Wide Range of Cancers in NCI Test

OTTAWA, ONTARIO, Oct 27, 2009 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) —-PharmaGap Inc. (TSX VENTURE: GAP)(OTCBB: PHRGF) (“PharmaGap” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce highly positive results from the United States National Cancer Institute (“NCI”) 5-dose in vitro anti-cancer screen of PharmaGap drug GAP-107B8. These results confirm and extend results announced in August from the single-dose study and provide definitive independent validation of GAP-107B8 as an active pharmaceutical ingredient against a wide range of cancers.

GAP-107B8 is a novel peptide protein kinase inhibitor that was designed to specifically target molecular signaling pathways in cancer cells. Targeted therapies are designed to target cancer cells while sparing surrounding normal, healthy, cells, thus causing less toxic effects than many standard chemotherapeutic agents currently in use.

Within a dose concentration range of 10 to 100 micromolar (u M), GAP-107B8 caused 100% growth inhibition (measured against cancer cell growth in untreated groups) in 51 of 56 cancer cell lines and caused at least 50% cancer cell death (measured against the number of cancer cells at the beginning of the test period) in 29 of 56 cancer cell lines.

The standard NCI test methodology generates three values that are used to measure the drug compound’s activity against the cancer cell-line panel. These are: the GI50, the dose that causes an average 50% growth inhibition in the cell lines; the TGI, the dose that causes an average 100% growth inhibition in the cell lines; and the LC50, the dose that causes an average 50% cell death in the cell lines. For GAP-107B8, the GI50 was determined to be 23 u M, the TGI was 51 u M, and the LC50 was 89 u M. These data provide a very clear range of focus for all future studies.

These results provided a large amount of data, from the NCI testing which will be used by the Company to select specific cancer types and to determine an optimum dosing range for future animal studies and subsequent clinical trials. Based on these and prior results, the Company will be focusing its immediate development program on ovarian cancer and melanoma. The first of these animal studies is currently underway at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (“OHRI”) in ovarian cancer. Further testing of GAP-107B8 on melanoma is about to commence under the guidance of Dr. Gary Schwartz at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. GAP-107B8 showed a strong effect in both melanoma and ovarian cancers in both single-dose and 5-dose testing at the NCI. In addition, the Company and NCI staff will meet in late November to discuss these results and ways in which the NCI may participate in various aspects of the development program for GAP-107B8.

The results across such a wide range of cancer cell lines, including a number which are known to be resistant to standard chemotherapy, indicate that GAP-107B8 has the potential to become a new cancer drug with less toxic side effects than common chemotherapeutic regimens.

Robert McInnis, President of the Company, stated “We are very pleased with the extent of activity in the NCI panel, as this activity against all cell lines provides a wide range of development opportunities for us, and provides us with additional support for a focus on ovarian cancer and melanoma. Our objective of the testing at the NCI – independent and verifiable validation of activity – has been fully realized. Over the past 12 months we have made significant progress in moving our lead drug to clinical trials: generating quality- controlled gram-scale production of the compound; achieving verifiable independent validation of compound activity at both the NCI and here in Ottawa at the OHRI; and programs underway in the area of bioassay development, understanding of signalling pathways involved, and continued testing programs at Memorial Sloan Kettering. This progress is very encouraging to me and to our team. Most importantly, results so far indicate a potential for new hope for the future of patients suffering from several types of cancer”.

About The National Cancer Institute

The National Cancer Institute (NCI), located in Bethesda, MD is an institute of the National Institutes of Health, the primary U.S. Federal Agency for conducting and supporting medical research. The NCI has a mandate to select and screen novel drug compounds that could potentially make a material difference in the “war against cancer”. Selection to the NCI screening program is through a competitive application process. Details on the NCI’s compound screening program can be found at http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/. More general information on the NCI is found at www.cancer.gov.

About PharmaGap Inc.

PharmaGap Inc. (TSX VENTURE: GAP)(OTCBB: PHRGF), based in Ottawa, ON, is a biotechnology company with a core focus on developing novel peptide therapeutics for the treatment of cancer. PharmaGap’s GAP-107B8 is a novel peptide drug designed to inhibit the activity of protein kinase C (PKC), a cell signalling enzyme implicated in certain types and stages of cancer. Independent peer-reviewed research has demonstrated that over-expression of PKC plays a role in the development of many cancer types. For more information please visit www.pharmagap.com.

Note: Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. No Securities Commission or other regulatory authority having jurisdiction over PharmaGap has approved or disapproved of the information contained herein. This release contains forward looking statements that may not occur or may change materially.

Contacts:
PharmaGap Inc.
Robert McInnis
President & CEO
613-990-9551
bmcinnis@pharmagap.com
www.pharmagap.com

SOURCE: PharmaGap Inc.

CytRx Unveils Clinical Development Plan for Pipeline Assets

Names World-Renowned Cancer Drug Expert Dr. Joseph Rubinfeld as Chief Scientific Advisor

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–CytRx Corporation (NASDAQ: CYTR) today unveiled its corporate strategy to focus its internal resources on the clinical development of oncology drug candidates tamibarotene and INNO-206, which the Company believes offer the greatest mix of near-term and medium-term revenue potential among its clinical assets. CytRx will pursue partnerships to advance the clinical development of INNO-406 (bafetinib) and its clinical molecular chaperone portfolio, where it continues to see significant future revenue potential. The Company further intends to use its proprietary high-throughput, high-content drug screening Master Chaperone Regulator Assay (MaCRA) platform to discover additional molecular chaperone drug candidates, including those that may inhibit cancer growth, which will support internal efforts to build an oncology drug franchise or future out-licensing possibilities.

CytRx also announced that Board of Directors’ member Dr. Joseph Rubinfeld has accepted the additional responsibility of Chief Scientific Advisor, and will consult on all aspects of the Company’s oncology development programs while serving as an important interface between the Company and investors, clinicians and industry thought leaders. Dr. Rubinfeld brings substantial expertise in oncology and drug development through his distinguished career. Dr. Rubinfeld was employed at Bristol-Myers Company International Division as Vice President and Director of Research and Development. While at Bristol-Myers, Dr. Rubinfeld was instrumental in licensing the original anticancer line of products, including Mitomycin and Bleomycin. Among other accomplishments, he was among the four co-founders of Amgen, Inc., and founded SuperGen, Inc., where he previously served as CEO, President and Chief Scientific Officer. In his career he has been instrumental in the development of several blockbuster cancer drugs including cisplatinum, etoposide, erythropoietin, decibitene and pentostatin, and the antibiotics amoxicillin and cefadroxil.

Steven A. Kriegsman, CytRx President and CEO said, “We feel that our stockholders are best served by a focus on potential therapeutics for cancer. We believe tamibarotene has strong potential as a revenue generator with a high likelihood for rapid U.S. approval as a third-line treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Our view is based on the substantial clinical history of tamibarotene as an approved treatment of relapsed APL, in Japan and the existing special protocol assessment (SPA) in place with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for our ongoing U.S. registration clinical trial. We are accelerating enrollment in this clinical trial, with the expectation of filing an NDA with the FDA as early as 2010. We are also taking steps to move into a Phase 2 clinical trial with INNO-206, our highly promising targetable pro-drug for the commonly prescribed chemotherapeutic doxorubicin. We believe that INNO-206 could be effective in a wide variety of cancers, including small cell lung cancer, sarcoma, breast and ovarian cancer and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.

“Importantly, we expect that we have ample financial resources with our current cash position and investment in RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation to support this strategy,” according to Mr. Kriegsman. “We have strong oncology expertise within CytRx and are delighted that Dr. Joseph Rubinfeld, our long-time board member who has enjoyed an illustrious career developing cancer drugs, will be taking a leadership role in our oncology programs.”

Dr. Rubinfeld said, “Having reviewed the extensive data on tamibarotene and INNO-206, I am excited about the potential for these two cancer drug candidates and look forward to working closely with the CytRx management team to advance their clinical development to potential commercialization. I am also encouraged by the Phase 1 data we announced earlier this month with INNO-406, now known as bafetinib, which demonstrated positive, clinical responses in 35% of patients with refractory chronic myeloid leukemia. I believe these results will be instrumental in our search for a partnership for bafetinib.”

Mr. Kriegsman added, “We also stand behind our view that our orally administered molecular chaperone drug candidates, arimoclomol and iroxanadine, provide enormous potential in addressing large, underserved markets and are convinced that the prudent course to maximize stockholder value in this economic climate is to pursue pharmaceutical partners to share additional development costs for these longer-term programs. We intend to complete our ongoing arimoclomol animal toxicology studies and work aggressively toward lifting the current clinical hold in order to enable this drug candidate to move back into the clinic. At that point, we will seek partners for further development of arimoclomol as a therapeutic treatment for both ALS and stroke recovery. Additionally, iroxanadine has shown significant potential as a therapeutic treatment for diabetic foot ulcers and other diabetic complications, and based on Phase 2 data, we will pursue potential partnerships in cardiovascular conditions.”

CytRx’s drug portfolio includes the following:

Oncology Drug Candidates:

Tamibarotene: CytRx holds the North American and European rights to tamibarotene, a rationally designed, synthetic retinoid compound designed to potentially avoid toxic side effects of the current first-line APL treatment trans-retinoic acid (ATRA). CytRx is actively enrolling patients in a Phase 2 registration clinical trial, known as STAR-1, with tamibarotene to evaluate its efficacy and safety as a third-line treatment for APL. The registration study is being conducted under a Special Protocol Assessment. The FDA has granted Orphan Drug Designation and Fast Track Designation for the use of tamibarotene in patients with relapsed or refractory APL following treatment with ATRA and arsenic trioxide.

There are currently no approved third-line treatment options for refractory APL patients. CytRx estimates the U.S. market opportunity for tamibarotene in refractory APL at approximately $20 million annually. CytRx scientists are also evaluating clinical strategies for developing tamibarotene as a first-line or second-line APL therapy. The estimated annual market potential in the U.S. and Europe for an expanded label including refractory, maintenance and front-line therapy is $150 million. CytRx also retains an option to expand its licenses for the use of tamibarotene in other cancers including multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome and certain solid tumors in the U.S., and multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome and solid tumors, other than hepatocellular carcinoma, in Europe.

INNO-206: This pro-drug derivative of the commonly prescribed chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin is designed to reduce adverse events by controlling drug release and preferentially targeting the tumor. In a Phase 1 study, INNO-206 was administered in doses at up to six times the standard dosing of doxorubicin without an increase in observed side effects over those historically seen with doxorubicin. Objective clinical responses were seen in patients with sarcoma, breast and lung cancers. The Company plans to evaluate further clinical development of INNO-206 in a wide variety of cancers, including sarcomas, breast and ovarian cancer, and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.

INNO-406 (bafetinib): INNO-406 (bafetinib), a potent, orally available, rationally designed, dual Bcr-Abl and Lyn-kinase inhibitor, is being evaluated for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and other leukemias that have a certain mutation called the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+) and are intolerant of or resistant to imatinib (Gleevec®) and second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (i.e. dasatinib (Sprycel®) and nilotinib (Tasigna®)). In November 2008, CytRx announced that bafetinib demonstrated positive, clinical responses in 35% of patients with CML in Phase 1 clinical testing. The Phase 1 clinical trial was used to determine the optimal dose prior to Phase 2 clinical efficacy testing.

CML is a type of cancer that starts in blood-forming cells of the bone marrow and invades the blood. In 2007, the American Cancer Society estimated that approximately 4,600 new cases of CML were diagnosed in the U.S. and that the number will increase as the population ages. Current estimates are that worldwide CML prevalence will increase by 10,000 patients a year, reaching a population of 110,000 in 2010. The global market will grow to an estimated $5.5 billion by 2012.

Molecular Chaperone Regulation

CytRx is a leader in molecular chaperone regulation technology. The Company currently has two orally administered, clinical-stage, drug candidates and recently discovered a series of additional compounds that may provide a pipeline for additional drug candidates. The Company’s drug candidates are believed to function by regulating a normal cellular protein repair pathway through the activation or inhibition of “molecular chaperones.” Because damaged proteins are thought to play a role in many diseases, activation of molecular chaperones that help to reduce the accumulation of misfolded proteins may have therapeutic efficacy in a broad range of disease states. Similarly, CytRx believes that the inhibition of molecular chaperones that normally help protect cancer cells from toxic misfolded proteins may result in the selective destruction of cancer cells.

  • Arimoclomol: This molecular chaperone regulator drug candidate is being considered as a treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease) and stroke recovery. Arimoclomol has been studied in seven Phase 1 and two Phase 2 clinical trials without any significant adverse events. CytRx’s Phase 2b clinical trial with arimoclomol as a treatment for ALS was placed on clinical hold by the FDA in January 2008, unrelated to any data generated by human studies, and additional preclinical toxicology studies are underway to resolve this issue.
  • Iroxanadine: CytRx believes that this orally available small molecule compound represents a potentially powerful breakthrough in the treatment of vascular diseases that are caused in part by damage to “vascular endothelium” that lines the inside of blood vessels. CytRx believes that endothelial dysfunction plays a key role in the development of various vascular diseases or their complications including diabetic ulcers, thrombosis, retinopathy, and peripheral artery disease. Preclinical and clinical studies with iroxanadine indicate that it has therapeutic potential for the treatment of cardiovascular atherosclerosis. According to the National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute, atherosclerosis is a leading cause of illness and death in the U.S. and affects approximately 4.6 million people annually.

CytRx San Diego Laboratory: The CytRx San Diego Laboratory is using the Company’s proprietary Master Chaperone Regulator Assay (MaCRA), a cell image-based screening tool that enables the rapid and quantifiable screening of large numbers of small molecule compounds. This technology is used to identify potential drug candidates that modify the activity of a protein known as heat shock transcription factor 1 (Hsf1) and consequently control entire groups of molecular chaperone proteins that repair or degrade toxic misfolded proteins present in diseased cells. Evaluation of the compounds identified in the screen has shown that they exhibit cytoprotective properties in cell culture models of disease. This platform has broad applicability to a range of therapeutic areas, through its ability to identify drug candidates that can either inhibit or amplify molecular chaperone activity. Information related to the development of MaCRA for compound screening was published in the November 2008 issue of the peer-reviewed Journal of Biomolecular Screening.

CytRx Oncology Expertise

Collectively, CytRx’s management and its Board of Directors have brought numerous cancer drugs to market. In addition to Dr. Rubinfeld, the senior managers and directors of CytRx who hold significant oncology experience include: Max Link, Ph.D., Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors since 1996, who served for a number of years as Chairman and CEO of Sandoz Pharma as well as a director of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Celsion Corporation and Discovery Laboratories, Inc.; Jack R. Barber, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer, who has significant R&D experience in oncology at Immusol and Viagene, where he most recently served as Head of Oncology; and Shi Chung Ng, Ph.D., Senior Vice President of Research and Development, who has substantial R&D experience at companies such as Abbott and ArQule, Inc., and most recently served as Vice President of Molecular Oncology at Ligand Pharmaceuticals.

About CytRx Corporation

CytRx Corporation is a biopharmaceutical research and development company engaged in the development of high-value human therapeutics. The CytRx drug development pipeline includes programs in clinical development for cancer indications, including tamibarotene in a registration study for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). CytRx is developing two drug candidates based on its industry-leading molecular chaperone technology, which aims to repair or degrade misfolded proteins associated with disease. The Company owns and operates a research and development facility in San Diego. CytRx also maintains a 45% equity interest in publicly traded RXi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: RXII). For more information on the Company, visit www.cytrx.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from the events or results described in the forward-looking statements, including risks relating to the outcome or results of any pre-clinical or clinical testing of CytRx’s potential oncology or molecular chaperone drug candidates, including tamibarotene as a third-line treatment for APL, risks related to CytRx’s ability to enter into partnerships to advance the clinical development of INNO-406 and its clinical molecular chaperone portfolio, uncertainties related to the impact of the FDA’s clinical hold on the Company’s arimoclomol clinical trial for ALS on the timing and ability to resume clinical testing at the desired dosage of arimoclomol, the risk that any requirements imposed on the Company’s planned clinical trial designs for ALS or stroke recovery by the FDA as a result of the concerns expressed in their clinical hold of the Company’s ALS program might adversely affect the Company’s ability to demonstrate that arimoclomol is efficacious in treating ALS or stroke patients or cause the Company to cancel one or both of those trials, risks related to CytRx’s need for additional capital or strategic partnerships to fund its ongoing working capital needs and development efforts, risks related to the future market value of CytRx’s investment in RXi and the liquidity of that investment, and the risks and uncertainties described in the most recent annual and quarterly reports filed by CytRx with the Securities and Exchange Commission and current reports filed since the date of CytRx’s most recent annual report. All forward-looking statements are based upon information available to CytRx on the date the statements are first published. CytRx undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

FDA Issues Public Health Advisory on Chantix

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today issued a Public Health Advisory to alert health care providers, patients, and caregivers to new safety warnings concerning Chantix (varenicline), a prescription medication used to help patients stop smoking.

On Nov. 20, 2007, FDA issued an Early Communication to the public and health care providers that the agency was evaluating postmarketing adverse event reports on Chantix related to changes in behavior, agitation, depressed mood, suicidal ideation, and actual suicidal behavior.

As the agency’s review of the adverse event reports proceeds, it appears increasingly likely that there may be an association between Chantix and serious neuropsychiatric symptoms. As a result, FDA has requested that Pfizer, the manufacturer of Chantix, elevate the prominence of this safety information to the warnings and precautions section of the Chantix prescribing information, or labeling. In addition, FDA is working with Pfizer to finalize a Medication Guide for patients. This is an example of FDA working with drug manufacturers throughout products’ lifecycles to keep health care professionals and patients informed of new and emerging safety data.

“Chantix has proven to be effective in smokers motivated to quit, but patients and health care professionals need the latest safety information to make an informed decision regarding whether or not to use this product,” said  Bob Rappaport, M.D., director of the FDA’s Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Rheumatology Products. “While Chantix has demonstrated clear evidence of efficacy, it is important to consider these safety concerns and alert the public about these risks. Patients should talk with their doctors about this new information and whether Chantix is the right drug for them, and health care professionals should closely monitor patients for behavior and mood changes if they are taking this drug.”

Chantix was approved by FDA in May 2006 as a smoking cessation drug. Chantix acts at sites in the brain affected by nicotine and may help those who wish to stop smoking by providing some nicotine effects to ease the withdrawal symptoms and by blocking the effects of nicotine from cigarettes if users resume smoking.

In the Public Health Advisory and a Health Care Professional Sheet that was also issued today, FDA emphasized the following safety information for patients, caregivers, and health care professionals:

Patients should tell their health care provider about any history of psychiatric illness prior to starting Chantix. Chantix may cause worsening of current psychiatric illness even if it is currently under control. It may also cause an old psychiatric illness to reoccur. FDA notes that patients with these illnesses were not included in the studies conducted for the drug’s approval.

Health care professionals, patients, patients’ families, and caregivers should be alert to and monitor for changes in mood and behavior in patients treated with Chantix. Symptoms may include anxiety, nervousness, tension, depressed mood, unusual behaviors and thinking about or attempting suicide. In most cases, neuropsychiatric symptoms developed during Chantix treatment, but in others, symptoms developed following withdrawal of varenicline therapy.

Patients should immediately report changes in mood and behavior to their doctor.

Vivid, unusual, or strange dreams may occur while taking Chantix.

Patients taking Chantix may experience impairment of the ability to drive or operate heavy machinery.

FDA will continue to update health care professionals with new information from FDA’s continuing review or if new information is received on Chantix and serious neuropsychiatric symptoms. FDA may consider requesting further revisions to the labeling or taking other regulatory action as the agency’s continuing reviews and conclusions warrant.

For more information:

http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/varenicline/default.htm

BIO Spent $6.6 Million on Lobbying Efforts in 2007

The Biotech Industry Organization (“BIO”) spent $6.6 Million on lobbying efforts in 2007, reported the Associated Press.

BIO’s lobbying efforts last year addressed a range of issues from patent reform to generics to FDA-related issues. The Associated Press reported as follows:

[BIO's] lobbying efforts went toward cloning issues ahead of the Food and Drug Administration’s ruling that cloned meat and milk is safe for consumers. Several members of Congress tried to compel the agency to do more studies before issuing a ruling, but FDA cleared the products for consumption in January.

The biotech industry also lobbied on legislation to allow the Food and Drug Administration to approve generic copies of biotech drugs. Generic drug companies already market cheaper versions of regular, chemical drugs, but the FDA does not have the authority to approve copies of biotech drugs, which are more complicated. Biotech makers opposed a bill that would have made generic biotechs medically interchangeable with the originals. The industry also argued generic biotechs should be classified as similar, but not interchangeable.

They also want biotech medicines to be guaranteed at least 12 years on the market before having to compete with generic copies. Generic drug makers say any protection beyond five years is unreasonable. Senate lawmakers attempted to pass a compromise bill last year, but negotiations broke down over the length of exclusivity.

This report raises some interesting questions about how much various industries spend today on their Washington lobbying efforts. One of the issues that has repeatedly come up in the patent reform debate is how minimal the biotech industry’s lobbying efforts are in contrast with the high tech industry. The argument has been that the proposed patent reform legislation favors the high tech industry, which has traditionally had more of a voice and presence in Washington. However, as this report makes clear, the biotech industry’s expenditures on lobbying–at least BIO’s expenditures on behalf of the industry–are not inconsequential. So, this report begs the question: if biotech’s lobbying efforts pale in comparison to high tech’s lobbying efforts on Washington, just how much is the high technology industry spending on Washington lobbying? What kind of lobbying money is considered adequate to have a voice in Washington?